|
thoughts on the elections & the congressA determination to protect the power over the purse -- something Congress has fiercely guarded since the earliest days of the Republic -- was on display Thursday as the House and Senate approved a bill preserving funding for a number of programs the White House had sought to cut.It was the latest move by lawmakers in both parties to support projects they consider important to their states -- and perhaps to their reelection prospects. The bill, which would fund environmental programs and the Interior Department, includes hundreds of earmarks: $1.4 million for repairs at Alcatraz, $650,000 for preservation of the Santa Barbara mission and $1 million for land purchases in the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, among others. That spending comes despite Obama's plea for lawmakers to scale back their controversial practice of steering money to pet projects. that's from richard simon's 'congress bucks obama on spending cuts' (los angeles times) and I say good for them. they weren't elected by barack obama, they were elected by their constituents. they need to remember that - especially with midterm elections approaching. they weren't elected by barack and they don't work for barack. and it's past time congress realized that. they work for their consitutents. if i hear 1 more deluded dem in congress saying 'i just want to do my part for my president,' i'll scream. you do your part for your constituents. screw the president - whomever he or she may be. you work for your constituents and that should always be your 1st concern. they should be asking each and every day: 'how did i serve the people in my district/state today?' and they should have an answer, a real answer. if they don't, that's their 1st hint that they're not doing their jobs. i see barack as a 1 term president. maybe he'll get re-elected, but i don't see it. let's say he does. okay, in 7 more years, many members of congress are still going to be in office. are they going to still be serving barry o? or will they 'serve' the next president (dem, republican or whatever)? they need to get focused on serving the communities that elected them. the inability to do that is part of the reason so many are polling so badly. it's not just harry reid although he is probably the best known example. and sorry but i hope jon corzine loses his race for re-election as governor. don't dislike him. but instead of making a case to the voters, he's got barry o breezing in and out of the state. what the hell does barack have to do with new jersey? not a damn thing. and if jon corzine - already the sitting governor - can't make a case for himself to the voters of new jersey that persuades them, he doesn't deserve to continue to hold office. let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:' Thursday,
October 29, 2009. Chaos and violence continue, the US military
announces another death, the Iraqi refugee crisis continues, problems
with the public inquiry into the Iraq War the UK government plans to
hold, no election law passed by the Iraqi Parliament, and more. Today the US military announced:
"JOINT BASE BALAD, Iraq – A Soldier who was currently assigned to the
13th Sustainment Command (Expeditionary) died Wednesday of a non-combat
related injury at Camp Adder, Iraq. The name of the deceased is being
withheld pending notification of next of kin and release by the
Department of Defense.The names of service members are announced
through the U.S. Department of Defense official website at http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/.
The announcements are made on the Web site no earlier than 24 hours
after notification of the service member's primary next of kin. The
incident is under investigation." The announcement brings the total
number of US service members killed in Iraq to 4353. Meanwhile
Sunday's Baghdad bombings have pretty much erased the August Baghdad
bombings ("Bloody Wednesday," "Black Wednesday," "Gory Wednesday,"
"Iraq's 9-11," etc.). Press TV reports,
"Iraq has arrested some 60 security forces over the weekend twin
bombings which targeted government buildings in Baghdad, killing up to
153 people." The Sentinel states the 60 were compoes of "11 army officers and 50 security officials". Xinhua adds, "The
arrested were in charge of providing security for a downtown Baghdad
district which was hit by the deadly suicide attacks that targeted
government buildings, Major General Qassim Atta said." BBC News notes,
"The BBC's Gabriel Gatehouse in Baghdad says it is not clear whether
those arrested are accused of negligence or collusion. However, he
added, it seems to confirm what many people have suspected - that the
security forces are susceptible to infiltration by insurgents or are
just not up to the job." Reuters reports
Qassim al-Moussawi, spokesperson for Baghdad security, "said that
officers, foot soldiers and police in areas where attacks happen would
be arrested in the future and placed under investigation." Jomana Karadsheh (CNN) adds,
Baghdad Governor "Abdul Razzaq said security forces made mistakes and
were negligent in their work, and he demanded a court-martial for those
who allowed explosive-laden vehicles to get through checkpoints."
Karadsheh also notes the number arrested is 61. Timothy Williams and Mohammed Hussein (New York Times) explain,
"The statement Thursday that announced the arrest order came from
Baghad Operations Command, which is responsible for security in the
capital and reports directly to Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki.
The statement did not offer any further details, so it remained unclear
whether the 61 security force members were suspected of having adied
those who carried out the attacks." The death toll for the Sunday bombings is at least 155 and does include children. Mohammed Jamjoom (CNN) reports: The force of the blast threw Rawnaq against the wall of her office at the Ministry of Justice. She instantly thought of her two children in the day care center just two floors below. "I rushed downstairs and found all the children under the rubble," says Rawnaq, "My daughter Tabarak was standing near the stairs. My son Hamoodi outside. Me and a colleague took them out, running. A police car drove us to the hospital." Both children were injured, 3-year-old Tabarak much more so than her 2-year-old brother. Severe head and back injuries have left the little girl needing extensive surgery and unable to sleep due to unceasing pain. She is also deeply afraid. Back
in August, the day before Bloody Wednesday, Iraqi Thug and Prime
Minister Nouri al-Maliki was in Syria where he was demanding that
nearly 200 Iraqis be handed over to Iraq. It was all like a bad acid
flashback since Nouri spent years in Syria and the Syrians refused to
turn him over at the whims of Saddam Hussein. Nouri was grateful back
then, now he's just a raging drama queen. Bloody Wednesday came the
next day and Nouri immediately blamed the bombings on Syria. He and his
spokespeople and cabinet would sometimes say that it was former
Ba'athists in Syria. Sometimes. Mainly they would rail against Syria.
That hasn't ceased all this time later. Phil Sands (Le Monde) offers
today that "Syria is perhaps the only country in the Arab middle east
that can truly claim to be independent from the US, and Damascus
remains a thorn in the side of American regional ambitions. [. . .] In
the post-Saddam Hussein world, the Iraqi government is jealous of its
sovereignty, an independence that goes only as deep as the presence of
more than 100,000 American soldiers on Iraqi soil allows. There is
little sign a planned pull-out will be complete." Syria has a huge
number of Iraqi refugees and we'll turn now to the topic of Iraqi
refugees. Joseph A. Kechichian (Gulf News) explains: According
to the International Organisation on Migration, there are still 1.6
million internally displaced Iraqis who cannot "return home". Many are
trying to survive "without work, their own home, schooling for
children, access to water, electricity and health care". These refugees
are Iraqi citizens who are not represented in government but whose
fates will probably determine whether the pool from which opposition
forces can recruit bombers will shrink. As it is widely recognised,
remnants of the Baath party or any number of the security services
created by the old regime are still active, even if Baghdad and its
allies continue to hearken to Al Qaida. The United Nations' World Food Program has launched
"a pilot project in Damascus" in which food vouchers are distributed
"in the form of mobile phone text messages to Iraqi refugees. [. . .]
Around one thousand families are involved in the four-month pilot
phase, which will be extended if it is successful. The project has been
developed in cooperation with the Syrian government, enabling the
refugees to redeem their vouches in state-run stores in the Jaramana
and Sayeda Zeinab neighourhoods of Damascus. The mobile phone service
provider MTN has donated SIM cards for the project." Cassandra Vinograd (Wall St. Journal) reported
Tuesday, "In the WFP program, each family will receive one $22 voucher
per person every two months. After each transaction, families will
receive an updated balance, also sent by SMS to their mobile numbers --
free of charge. There are more than 1.2 million displaced Iraqis in
Syria, according to government figures. To date, about 130,000
regularly receive food assistance from WFP with complimentary food and
non-food assistance from the U.N.'s refugee agency." Though some have
criticized the WFP for targeting people with cell phones (under the
mistaken belief that refugees wouldn't have them), Richard Spencer (Telegraph of London) reports,
"The discovery that most of the 130,000 people to whom the organisation
provided food vouchers had mobile phones gave officials the idea for
the pilot scheme, to be targeted at 1,000 families in the first
instance." Laura MacInnis (Reuters) quotes
Emilia Casella, WFP spokesperson, stating, "They will be able to
exchange their electronic vouchers for rice, wheat, flour, lentils,
chickpeas, oil and canned fish, as well as cheese and eggs -- items
that cannot usually be included in conventional aid baskets." Saeed Ahmed (CNN) quotes
Casella stating, "It infuses some contribution to the communities,
because we're not giving food away. They have to go to the local shops
to buy it." Staying with Syria, the United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees expects more Iraqi refugees to flee to Syria as a result
of Sunday's bombings. EU News Network states
UNHCR spokesperson Andrej Mahecic "told a delegation in Geneva earlier
this month that the United Nations recommended the resettlement of more
than 80,000 Iraqi refugees to other countries." Meanwhile UNHCR is building homes in Taza, Iraq following bombings there this sumemr which ledft many people homeless,
"Immediately after the blast, UNHCR field staff visited Taza to assess
the damage and to distribute emergency aid to the survivors. The team
found that about 160 houses, mostly made from mud bricks, had been
totally destroyed and some 400 damaged. As a result, around 3,500
people were left without shelter. The refugee agency immediately swung
into action, funding the reconstruction of 150 collapsed homes and the
renovation of 73 shops and two other buildings in Shorja Market. The
work was carried out by an Iraqi implementing partner as part of
UNHCR's emergency shelter programme which has helped rehabilitate some
10,000 conflict-damaged buildings for refugees and internally displaced
Iraqis and aims to double this figure in 2010." But in Syria, IRIN reports,
a significant number of Iraqis are attempting to win asylum "across the
Middle East to Europe and North America" and they note, "A year after
its launch, strikingly few Iraqis have taken up the UN's Voluntary Repatriation Programme.
Less than 300 families from Syria have returned to Iraq under the
programme, though the number claiming resettlement has grown rapidly." The Chicago Tribune did a multi-article series at the start of the week on Iraqi refugees in the US. The paper noted of one group:
"Back home, they worked for the Americans, as translators, project
specialists and office managers. For that, they received death threats
from militants opposed to the U.S., and they ask to remain anonymous,
fearing retribution against relatives in Iraq." Then there's Layla Mousa
whose husband is in Jordan while she and their three children are in
Chicago where she struggles to make ends meet, find work (she's a hair
dresser) and rebuffs offers of payment for sex and states, "Now I want
to go back to Iraq, not even Jordan. America is just a lie." Layla
Mousa is among the Iraqi refugees who Ahlam Mahmoud attempts to asist
even though she herself is a refugee: "She didn't have it easy herself.
When she and her two children arrived in Chicago in 2008, she had only
the clothes she was wearing when she left Syria, where, she says, she
was imprisoned for refusing to spy on foreigners. The apartment they
got in Chicago had three beds, one plate, a fork, a spoon and two
knives." In Syria, Ahlam Mahmoud was also someone refugees turned to.
Using her own resourceful nature, she quickly began developing a
network of assistance and advice. Due to her connections, the Syrian
government attempted to force her to spy on other Iraqi refugees. She
refused and was thrown into prison. When the outcry and attention
became too much, the Syrian govenment ordered her released from prison
and she was quickly transported to the US. Also attempting to assist
other refugees is Fatima Hindi who became an Iraqi government official,
was then kidnapped and sought Egypt and then the US for safety along
with her three-year-old daughter Takwa. She states, "They kidnapped me
because of America. America couldn't protect me. When I first got here,
I cried on the street." Today Nancy Eshelman (Patriot-News) reports
on Iraqi refugee Zina Alkubaisy who ended up in the United States with
her husband and their children following her husband's kidnapping:
"Alkubaisy began working the phones. She contacted people who knew
people and eventually learned what militant group had snatched her
husband. Her connections arranged to have him released the next day.
But a chilling phone call warned the couple they would not be so lucky
the next time. It would be in their best interest to leave the
country." The October 22nd snapshot noted the United Nations High Commisoner for Refguees (UNHCR) released a new report entitled "Asylum
Levels and Trends in Inudstrialized Countries First Half 2009:
Statistical overview of asylum applications lodged in Europe and
selected non-European countries." The report found that Iraqis continued to be the number one aslyum-seekers around the globe. Last Friday UNHCR's Andrej Mahecic spoke on the issue of Iraqi refugees and the forcible deportation of them: UNHCR
is concerned about the fact that some European states have begun
forcibly returning Iraqi originating from the region of Central Iraq
over the last few months. In our guidelines issued last April, we noted
that in view of the serious human rights violations and continuing
security incidents throughout Iraq, most predominantly in the central
governorates, asylum-seekers from these governorates should be
considered to be in need of international protection. UNHCR therefore
advises against involuntary returns to Iraq of persons originating from
Central Iraq until there is a substantial improvement in the security
and human rights situation in the country. This
reminder comes after the UK attempted to forcibly return 44 Iraqi men
to Baghdad earlier this month. They were reportedly unsuccessful asylum
claimants held in immigration removal centres in the UK. Iraq only
accepted 10 who were allowed to leave the chartered aircraft in
Baghdad, and the remaining 34 were returned to the UK and placed in
immigration centres. Other European
states have signed readmission agreements with Iraq for voluntary and
forced return. Denmark has forcibly returned 38 people originating
mainly from Central and Southern Iraq since signing its agreement in
May 2009. Sweden has undertaken some 250 forced returns with an
unspecified number of returnees originating from the five central
governorates of Iraq since signing an agreement in February 2008. UNHCR
has also concerns about the safety and dignity of these returns. Concerning
asylum-seekers from the three northern governorates, as well as those
from the southern governorates and Al Anbar, UNHCR recommends that
their protection needs are assessed on an individual basis. Colin Yeo (Guardian) evaluates the UK Home Office's attempt to forcibly deport Iraqi refugees this month: The second problem is a profound lack of understanding or respect for the rule of law at all levels of UKBA. Six Iraqis
were taken off the removals flight because they had managed to get in
touch with good lawyers. A high court judge was persuaded that the
flight might be unlawful because the route and destination were unknown
and Iraq is a highly unstable country, as the appalling recent bomb
attacks and interviews
with those who did return to Iraq vividly demonstrate. The flight was
no less unlawful for the other Iraqis yet UKBA went on regardless,
simply because the other Iraqis did not manage to get a lawyer. Some
may disagree with the refugee convention and human rights law, but they
are the law of the land and while they remain so they must be
respected. But
like an unruly toddler, the Home Office believes that what matters is
whether they are caught, not what the rules are. Time and time again
the Home Office is found to be acting unlawfully: on prolonged unlawful
detention, secret policies, misleading the courts and failure to
respect court judgments in the last fortnight alone. Substantial
compensation is paid to some of the victims as a result. What UKBA
fails to appreciate is that there are many, many more victims whose
rights are violated but who never manage to secure the protection of
the rule of law. Friday's snapshot noted that Christians in northern Iraq were under attack again and weighing whether or not to leave Kirkuk. Richard Spencer (Telegraph of London) noted
"Baghdad's dwindling Christian population. Even in the darkest days of
Saddam Hussein's rule, it was a thriving community. Now it is half
gone,d riven out by the casual lawlessness of the streets." Iraqi
Christians make up a significant number of external refugees. (It
should also be noted that Baghdad's Jewish community has been decimated
since the start of the illegal war.) While much attention was given to
the government buildings damaged and destroyed in Sunday's bombings, Adirenne S. Gaines (Charisma Magazine) reports that St. George's Church in Baghdad was also badly damaged. Though the issue wasn't important enough for the New York Times to put it in print, they did post a blog by Rod Nordland:
"Built in 1936 by the British military during their occupation of Iraq,
the church loast some of its famous stained-glass windows when the
United States military bombed a nearby building in 1992, and more were
destroyed during the invasion in 2003, leaving only three examples
remaining. They were mementos of British regiments stationed there.
Sunday the last three stained glass windows were blown out by suicide
bomb blasts that destroyed three Iraqi government buildings nearby,
according to the church's lay pastor, Faiz Georges." Episcopal Life notes the church has approximately 2,000 members. On the issue of Iraq's religous minorities, Senator Carl Levin's office released the following statement Monday: WASHINGTON -- Calling the plight of religious minorities in Iraq "a tragic consequence" of the war there, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., today introduced a Senate resolution calling on the U.S. government, Iraqi government and United Nations Mission in Iraq to take steps to alleviate the dangers facing these minority groups. Sens. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., joined Levin in sponsoring the sense of the Senate resolution. "While violence has declined in Iraq overall, religious minorities continue to be the targets of violence and intimidation," Levin said. "Members of many minority groups who have fled other parts of the country have settled in the north, only to find themselves living in some of the most unstable and violent regions of Iraq. We strongly urge the Iraqi government, the United Nations and the U.S. government to address this crisis without delay." Of approximately 1.4 million Christians of various denominations living in Iraq in 2003, only 500,000 to 700,000 remain. Another minority group, the Sabean Mandeans, has seen its population decline by more than 90 percent. Iraq's Jewish community, once one of the largest in the Arab world, has almost ceased to exist. According to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, members of religious minorities "have experienced targeted intimidation and violence, including killings, beatings, abductions, and rapes, forced conversions, forced marriages, forced displacement from their homes and businesses, and violent attacks on their houses of worship and religious leaders." The U.N. High Commissioner on Refugees reported that in 2008, there were an estimated 2.8 million internally displaced persons living in Iraq. Of that 2.8 million, nearly two out of three reported fleeing their home because of a direct threat to their lives, and, of that number, almost nine out of ten said they were targeted because of their ethnic or religious identity. The resolution introduced by the senators addresses the tragedy in several ways. It states the sense of the Senate that the fate of Iraqi religious minorities is a matter of grave concern and calls on the U.S. government and the United Nations to urge Iraq's government to increase security at places of worship, particularly where members of religious minorities are known to face risks. The resolution calls for the integration of regional and religious minorities into the Iraqi security forces, and for those minority members to be stationed within their own communities. The resolution calls on the Iraqi government to ensure that minority citizens can participate in upcoming elections, and to enforce its constitution, which guarantees "the administrative, political, cultural, and educational rights" of minorities. Finally, it urges a series of steps to ensure that development aid and other forms of support flow to minority communities in Iraq. Iraq
is the source of more external refugees than any other country
currently; however, Iraq does have refugees in its own country
including the Palestinians who are trapped on borders and largely
ignored by the global community as they live lives as prisoners, unable
to leave Iraq and unable to leave the tented, border communities
they've been exiled to since the start of the illegal war. In addition
to the Palestinians, there are the Iranian refugees of the MEK.
Welcomed into Iraq by Saddam Hussein decades ago, they've called Iraq
home for some time. The Iranian government doesn't care for them so you
know Nouri's going to jump when that government snaps. Until 2009, the
US was protecting the MEK who reside in Camp Ashraf. Nouri gave the US
government repeated assurances that he would respect the refugees.
Then, on July 28th, he launched an assault on Camp Ashraf. Saturday Jamshid Karegarfar's account of what happened was published in the Washington Times: The
situation came to a head July 28, when some 2,000 Iraqi forces stormed
Ashraf, and to add insult to injury, used American Humvees and weapons
to do so, while the Americans stood by and watched. The attack left 11
dead and 500 injured - and the Iraqis took 36 Ashraf residents as
hostages. I was one of them. At first, we
were held outside Ashraf. During the first days of captivity we were
severely beaten, and went through physical and psychological torture.
Some of us who were run over by Humvees and hit by bullets were in
excruciating pain. Then, we were
transferred to the local prison in the city of Khalis. From there, they
took us to an Iraqi military intelligence detention center and finally
to the prison at al-Muthana airfield.The goal was to break us down. But
we refused to give in. In protestof the
raid and being taken hostage, we went to a hunger strike and refused
food for weeks, and we prayed for deliverance. We had no idea what was
happening or why we were being held. And we had no idea of the support
we were getting around the world. The
government or 'government' out of Baghdad can't help the refugees or
their own people. They can't even pass an election law apparently. "If
it doesn't make a deal before this weekend, Iraq will run out of time
to organize an election before Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's term
expires," Renee Montagne observed on today's Morning Edition (NPR). Renee Montagne: What, Quil, is at stake with the delay of this election law? Quil Lawrence: Well, as you say, the Iraqi prime minister and his government's term run out on January 31st so the election commission here has said they need 90 days to organize a legitimate poll and Parliament is deadlocked on over a dozen or so complicated issues regarding the election. They may vote on it today. If the elections are delayed or if they are rushed, there's a risk that Iraq's government could be deemed illegitimate and then a whole Pandora's Box of problems can open up -- issues of legitimacy of the government, maybe even a crisis like we've seen in Afghanistan. One big question is whether the US has done enough to push it through, especially since their plan to pull out 70,000 troops by August can't really start until the elections are done. Renee Montagne: Well six years on the ground in Baghdad, hasn't the American embassy there worked up a fair amount of what you might call institutional knowledge regarding Iraqi politics? Quil Lawrence: Well the problem is it took the Obama administration four months to get an ambassador confirmed and out here and that's taken that ambassador another couple of months to assemble a new political team. So he's got a good number of people with expertise in the region -- a good number of Arabic speakers -- but they've never been to Iraq before, many of them. So before they can have much influence, they need to learn who the players are and build these personal relationships with them and that could take months and years. Renee Montagne: Although haven't American diplomats been, in a sense, pressing the flesh at the Parliament. Quil Lawrence: There's been as many as six of them at a time over at the Parliament but it's sometimes curious who they're meeting with or not meeting with on the Iraqi side. And like I said, they're just getting up to speed so it's possible they could walk right past a very important Iraqi politician in the halls of Parliament and not even know him by face. Okay, on the above. On pulling out troops (which is the draw-down, not the "withdrawal" as so many outlets keep insisting -- confusing the two in a way that even the White House doesn't) and how it can't start until after the election? Yesterday, the KRG swore in their prime minister's cabinet. Yesterday. Elections were held in July. In December 2005, Iraq last held the national elections. Nouri comes along in April as the US-installed prime minister (after the US rejected the Iraqis first choice). In May, he announces his cabinet. Point? The counting of the votes, the verifying and assorted other issues mean the elections are not 'over' in January even if held then. As for a vote happening as early as today, CNN reports that as well but notes, "The Kurdish bloc in the Iraqi parliament intends to boycott the vote on a proposed election law if the oil-rich province of Kirkuk is banned from voting in next year's national elections, two Kurdish lawmakers say." Mu Xuequan (Xinhua) reports that "the Iraqi parliamentary legal committee again failed to reach a compromise over Kirkuk issue, and decided to delay Thursday's parliament session to Sunday, an official in the parliament told Xinhua." This, Xuequan reports, despite efforts today by US Ambassador to Iraq Chris Hill and the top US commander in Iraq Gen Ray Odierno to "urge" Iraqi politicians to pass a law. No law was passed but violence continued . . . Bombings? Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roadside bombing injured five people and a Mosul suicide bomber took his own life. Shootings? Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports
an armed attack on a Mosul police checkpoint which left 3 police
officers dead and an armed clash in Mosul in which one person was
injured. Today is the 2413 day of the Iraq War. Jake Armstrong (Pasadena Weekly) notes that and other facts -- and he notes Iraq facts each week, by the way, in his "The Count." In England, Peter Walker (Guardian) reports
that the inquiry into the Iraq War will hear evidence starting November
24th and that former Prime Minister Tony Blair will be offering public
testimony. Chris Ames (at The Index on Censorship) reports: As
the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war announces its first public
hearings, serious concerns about censorship and secrecy are beginning
to arise. Some of those who are thinking about giving evidence are
wondering how free they will be to do so and whether the evidence they
present will ever see the light of day. Tony
Blair's upcoming appearance at the Inquiry has taken centre stage, with
his actions on Iraq threatening his bid to become the first EU
president. While Blair won't face prosecution in this Inquiry for
launching the war, witnesses fear they might be prosecuted for talking
about it. Other political factors also
play a role in the timing of the hearings, which will open on 24
November. Sir John Chilcot said that the Inquiry intends to stop these
hearings during the general election campaign, expected in the spring.
It appears that the move is intended to limit the possibility for
highly charged appearances or new disclosures to influence voters. This
should not be a consideration for the Inquiry, which is supposedly
independent of government. Chilcot has
also suggested that the Inquiry's report, which is not expected until
at least the end of next year, might not be published in full but might
include a secret annexe dealing with intelligence matters. Meanwhile in Malaysia tomorrow and Saturday, Meena L. Ramadas (Sun Daily) reports,
a tribunal, the War Criminal Conference and Exhibition, will be held
which will hear from "a Sudanese reporter and a Briton who were
detained without trial in Guantanamo Bay" "in an effort to bring Iraq
war perpetrators to justice." Tun Mahathir bin Mohamad (Malaysia's
prime minister from 1981 to 2003) will be the keynote speaker and he
states, "International institutions and the courts established by the
United Nations charter have done nothing in dealing with war crimes.
Even the powerful nations like the United States and the United Kingdom
have done nothing." War is big business. Tom Fowler (Houston Chronicle) reports
that with KBR getting less work in Iraq, it "reported a 14 percent drop
in third-quarter profit". KBR insists it did professional work. Few not
currently working for KBR who've seen their work in Iraq make the same
assertions. KBR's shoddy work may be responsible for multiple deaths of
US citizens -- death by shower. On the topic of death by shower, Jeremy Scahill's "Pentagon Investigation Iraq Electrocution Death" (The Nation) reports: The Department of Defense has confirmed that the US Army Criminal Investigation Command has launched a formal investigation into the electrocution death of 25-year-old Adam Hermanson, a US Air Force veteran-turned private security contractor who died in a shower at the compound of his employer, Triple Canopy, at Camp Olympia inside Baghdad's Green Zone on September 1, 2009. The State Department's Regional Security Office is also investigating. The DoD appears to be placing responsibility for the deadly incident squarely on Triple Canopy. "As part of the terms and conditions of the JCC-I/A contract, Triple Canopy is solely responsible for providing billeting, showers, latrines and other life support activities to its employees at Camp Olympia," according to Under Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter. Hermanson is the nineteenth US soldier or contractor to die from electrocution in Iraq since 2003. KBR
denies having anything to do with the wiring which, if true, would mean
they weren't responsible for the above shock . . . just approximately
230 other ones. The heartbeat went out of our house The rhythm went out of our romance But in life that happens and you just have to remember to breathe . . . That's from Carly Simon's "Coming Around Again" as redone on her latest album, Never Been Gone. Today she was on NPR's Talk Of The Nation and discussed a variety of topics including singing with Lucy Simon in the Simon Sisters and recently on the phone. In terms of revisiting ten of her classic songs for the new album, Carly observes, "Yes, it was a very interesting kind of synergy between the old and the new." To hear her segment with host Neal Conan click here and note NPR online has paired it up with her 2008 concert which you can also stream. Click here to watch Carly on Monday's Good Morning America (ABC). Carly Simon appeared on NBC's Today Show yesterday and performed "You Belong To Me." |
| Leave a Comment: |